January 5, 2019

Often when writing WebGL programs, it takes quite some time until we reach the stage when we can tell if our shapes render correctly. That's when wireframes come in as a handy tool for debugging. Seeing all the triangles is valuable. And the least disturbing, the simplest-to-use method is the one we want.

Some time ago I learned about a cool trick to use barycentric coordinates for drawing wireframes. Here's what it looks like in practice:

What does it take to draw them? Some modifications to the vertex and fragment shaders, another vertex attribute and generating corresponding barymetric coordinate for each point.

In general, barycentric coordinates define locations in a selected simplex (triangle, tetrahedron and so on, whatever comes after that). In our case, they express the position of any point in a triangle using three scalars.

P = xA + yB + zC x + y + z = 1

Quite a lot of smart math can be written about them, so instead I will provide an example. Imagine I have a simple triangle and additional attribute, `a_barycentric`

, which vectors equal respectively `(1, 0, 0)`

, `(0, 1, 0)`

, `(0, 0, 1)`

. I will just show the shaders:

```
attribute vec2 a_position;
attribute vec3 a_barycentric;
varying vec3 vbc;
void main() {
vbc = a_barycentric;
gl_Position = vec4(a_position.xy, 0, 1);
}
```

```
precision mediump float;
varying vec3 vbc;
void main() {
gl_FragColor = vec4(vbc, 1.0);
}
```

And the result:

As it turns out, the values of the `vbc`

vector are perfectly interpolated.

By looking at the code, you can guess that passing value from the vertex to the fragment shader makes the GPU interpolate values. Just as a reminder, here are the variable qualifiers in the shaders:

**const**– compile-time constant**attribute**– assigned one per vertex, visible only in vertex shaders, read-only**varying**– used for interpolating data between vertex and fragment shaders; available for writing in vertex shader, read-only in fragment

The coordinates we will pass to the GPU look like this. For every triangle consisting of 6 vertices (3 points of two coordinates), we will have three points of three coordinates, respectively: `p_1 = (1, 0, 0)`

, `p_2 = (0, 1, 0)`

, `p_3 = (0, 0, 1)`

.

```
function calculateBarycentric(length) {
const n = length / 6;
const barycentric = [];
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) barycentric.push(1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1);
return new Float32Array(barycentric);
}
```

I am leaving out the `setup`

and `draw`

functions. They have nothing special in them. a matter of acquiring `a_position`

, `a_barycentric`

and `u_matrix`

along with the buffers. And then, rendering the shape in 2D projection, restricting the size of the target view to the max `x`

and `y`

positions in the vertex arrays. Check out the sources below for the code.

One here that is definitely non-standard is the presence of `gl.getExtension`

function. It allows us to use standard derivatives in shaders.

```
const vertices = new Float32Array([
45, 95, 50, 185, 0, 80, 45, 95, 0, 80, 100, 0, 190, 85, 270, 35, 345, 140,
190, 85, 345, 140, 255, 130, 190, 85, 255, 130, 215, 210, 190, 85, 215, 210,
140, 70, 140, 70, 45, 95, 100, 0, 140, 70, 100, 0, 190, 85,
]);
const barycentric = calculateBarycentric(vertices.length);
const canvas = setUpCanvas();
const gl = canvas.getContext("webgl");
const vertexShader = createShader(gl, gl.VERTEX_SHADER, vertex);
const fragmentShader = createShader(gl, gl.FRAGMENT_SHADER, fragment);
const program = createProgram(gl, vertexShader, fragmentShader);
const scene = setup(gl, program, vertices, barycentric);
const render = () => draw(gl, program, scene);
render();
window.addEventListener("resize", render);
```

And the last part – shaders. I've waited with them until now on purpose since they will be the most interesting part.

The vertex shader is simple. It's all about using a projection matrix to calculate vertex position and passing the barycentric coordinate to the vertex shader as a varying parameter.

```
attribute vec2 a_position;
attribute vec3 a_barycentric;
uniform mat3 u_matrix;
varying vec3 vbc;
void main() {
vbc = a_barycentric;
gl_Position = vec4((u_matrix * vec3(a_position, 1)).xy, 0, 1);
}
```

It gets more interesting in the fragment shader. Assuming we only know that the barycentric coordinates are the clue here, let's start with something simple. If any of the coordinates is lower than 0.01 – render it black.

```
precision mediump float;
varying vec3 vbc;
void main() {
if(vbc.x < 0.01 || vbc.y < 0.01 || vbc.z < 0.01) {
gl_FragColor = vec4(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
} else {
gl_FragColor = vec4(0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 1.0);
}
}
```

The result:

It looks like it doesn't work. And if you think about it for a moment – it makes perfect sense. We are making ourselves dependent on a constant value: 0.01 of the distance from the edge to the center of mass. As every triangle is stretched differently, we get borders of varying widths. That's not exactly what we expected.

As always, math comes to the rescue. If the exact value of the function of change is not the one we want, how about the pace of its change? In other words: let's go for the derivative.

`fwidth = |∂f / ∂x * b| + |∂f / ∂x * b|`

Having the derivative, we have to somehow calculate if we are close enough to the edge to consider its border. For that, I am using a `step`

function. If you are not familiar with it, here is how it can be implemented:

```
const step = (v1, v2) => v1.map((_, i) => (v1[i] > v2[i] ? 1.0 : 0.0));
```

Then, I am getting the lowest out of those three resulting coordinates. This is then extended to a vector of three (the value gets copied to each coordinate, like: `(v, v, v)`

). Since those values will be either 0 or 1, I am getting `min`

of it and `color`

, which will result in 0 (black) for the borders and `color`

elsewhere. Seems to do the trick.

```
#extension GL_OES_standard_derivatives : enable
precision mediump float;
varying vec3 vbc;
const float lineWidth = 1.0;
const vec3 lineColor = vec3(0.7, 0.7, 0.7);
float edgeFactor() {
vec3 d = fwidth(vbc);
vec3 f = step(d * lineWidth, vbc);
return min(min(f.x, f.y), f.z);
}
void main() {
gl_FragColor = vec4(min(vec3(edgeFactor()), color), 1.0);
}
```

One more thing, but very crucial: add this line to your code. It might be necessary to ask for extension in the fragment shader.

```
// const gl = canvas.getContext('webgl') <-- under this line
gl.getExtension("OES_standard_derivatives");
```

And the ready wireframe once again:

Source: github.com.

**Hint:** in this particular case you could encode barymetric coordinate using binary encoding on two values, with `(1, 0, 0) -> (0, 1), (0, 1, 0) -> (1, 0), (0, 0, 1) -> (1, 1)`

or any other way you want. Why use two values? Because we can take `vec4`

, use the first two coordinates for position and use the other two for barymetric coordinates. It's common among GPU programmers to use tricks like that to send less information to the GPU. It quickly becomes crucial to the performance.

codeflow – easy wireframe display with barycentric coordinates – the place where I originally learned about this technique.

scratchapixel on barycentric coordinates – great information regarding barycentric coordinates in general.

glsl-solid-wireframe – there are libs for achieving this effect, too.

Sometimes I write blogposts. It doesn’t happen very often or in regular intervals, so subscribing to my newsletter might come in handy.

I promise I will use this one only for sending blogposts and nothing else. If I ever want to organize any broader newsletter, there will be another form.

At the moment there are **...** people subscribing.